Crypto could justifiably spend even more on lobbying

Key Points

  • Cryptocurrency industry's political spending is justified as a means of survival and safeguarding the industry.
  • The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision allows for unlimited political spending by domestic entities, making it a legal reality.
  • Spending on political activism by the crypto industry is seen as efficient, with potential high returns given the industry's future value.

Summary

In his opinion piece, Aaron Brogan, founder of Brogan Law, argues that the cryptocurrency industry's political spending, particularly through PACs like Fairshake, is not only justified but necessary for its survival. Despite criticisms of being unfair or inefficient, Brogan points out that the legal framework established by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision allows for such expenditures. He counters the inefficiency critique by suggesting that the crypto industry's spending isn't merely redistributive but aims to protect an industry that adds value to society. Brogan highlights the existential threat posed by regulatory bodies like the SEC, which have historically made it difficult for crypto businesses to operate legally. He frames the industry's political spending as a strategic necessity, especially in pivotal election years, where the potential benefits far outweigh the costs. The article underscores the industry's belief in its mission and the need to advocate for its survival in a challenging regulatory environment.

cointelegraph
January 28, 2025
Crypto
Read article

Related news