The White House cited these economists to justify its tariffs. They aren't thrilled.

Key Points

  • Anson Soderbery, an economist at Purdue University, was cited by the Trump administration for his research in justifying new tariffs, despite his study arguing against such policies.
  • The administration's tariff calculation method was criticized for being overly simplistic and not accurately reflecting economic principles or the cited research.

Summary

Anson Soderbery, an economist at Purdue University, found himself unexpectedly at the center of controversy when the Trump administration cited his research to justify imposing steep tariffs on America's trade partners. Despite his study arguing against such policies, Soderbery received numerous emails from friends and acquaintances after President Trump announced the tariffs in a Rose Garden speech. The administration's approach to calculating these tariffs was met with skepticism and criticism from the economic community. Instead of matching tariffs directly, the White House used a formula that divided each country's trade surplus with the US by the amount of imports from that country, then halved the result. This method was described as crude and arbitrary by critics, including economists whose work was cited but misapplied. For instance, Harvard's Alberto Cavallo noted that if his research had been correctly applied, the tariffs would have been significantly lower. The administration later provided a more detailed explanation, but many still viewed the approach as amateurish, highlighting a disconnect between the policy's intent and its economic justification.

yahoo
April 4, 2025
Stocks
Read article

Related news